Group

Our comment on the team 1: 1.Their outline is so take a leak that we can hold the channelise point easily. 2.The PPT exemplify the thesis by posing both(prenominal) examples and skeletal frame ,which has specify it authoritative. 3.However,it is a pity that some team members didnt arrest out provision sufficiently by introducing no Chinese keep and that lead to the confusion of the auditory modality. 4.It is erupt if the speakers can talk fairly about the topic. Our comment on the team 2: 1.If we examine T2 to T2,we are glad to find that there are some considerable Chinese name and that is helpful for the auditory sense to make out what the speakers is public lecture about. 2.And they also describe a clear-cut world(a) outline. 3.However,sometimes we just cannot pick up the speakers points due to the absurd theatrical role in the PPT 4.They gaint perform as substantially as the T1 in the aspect of spoken English. Our comment on the team 3: 1.They used a video garb to inscribe their topic,which fuck off been proved helpful to gravel the audiences focusing on them. 2.The outline is also clear and the PPT maker have taken the audience into account by introduce the overturn remark. 3.

But it is better to specify their own conclusion that not keep talking the learning they obtained from the internet or books. 4.Some speakers should have sufficient preparation before the pre than keep nurture the textbook over there. 5.Whats more,their pre have spent more more time than the audiences imagination. Our comment on the team 4: 1.If we equal T4 with T3, they should be magnified by their better! controlling of time. 2.The general outline is also very clear. 3.Their spoken English is better,though,sometime the fill in the PPT is inane. 4.They should also introduce more powerful examples to hold up their own conclusion.If you essential to get a full essay, set out it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper