Lincoln - Douglas Debate :: essays research papers

approbatory Case Introduction- "We essential use every tool ofdiplomacy and jurisprudence we have available, while maintainingboth the capacity and the resolve to defend freedom. We must have the vision to explore new avenues when familiarones seem closed. And we must go forward with a will asgreat as our goal to build a practical peace that will campaign through the remaining years of this century and farinto the next. Because I intrust so strongly in the words ofU.S. Secretary of State, Madeleine Albright, when shespoke at the Stimson Center Event, June 10, 1998, that Iask you to affirm todays resolution, determined The use ofeconomic sanctions to accomplish U.S. Foreign Policy goals ismoral. Before I go on, I feel it necessary to define some chance on phrases in this resolution ? Economic sanctions- thedeliberate, regimen inspired withdrawal, or terror ofwithdrawal, of customary trade or financial relations."Customary" does not reckon "contractual" i t simply meanslevels of trade and financial activity that would crediblyhave occurred in the absence of sanctions. ? To achieve- tofulfill ? U.S. Foreign Policy goals- to espouse changesexpressly sought by the sender state in the semipoliticalbehavior of the train state. ? Moral- capable of right andwrong action or of being governed by a sense of rightsubject to the uprightness of duty. I ask you to affirm this resolutionin order to achieve my all-important value premise of social welfargon. To make my position clear, I will definesocietal welfare as the linked States governments duty toact in the nations crush interest. This also refers to what themajority of the citizens want. To achieve societal welfare, Ishall utilize the bar of national security. I will definenational security as the governments obligation to protectits citizens. It is in this way that the United Statesgovernment must proceed to achieve its greatest goal ofsocietal welfare by exercising the security of o ur nation.Now on to the marrow squash of the affirmative case My firstcontention in this debate is that sanctions learn to modifybehavior, not punish. Sanctions do not exist to ostracize orpunish, but rather they encourage a change of policy thatleads to respect with standards of international law.One of our goals is to change or destabilize the targetsgovernment, which means to change its policies that involvehuman rights, terrorism, and nuclear nonproliferation.Others are to disrupt a relatively minor military adventureand to change the policies of the target in a major way,such as, to surrender a territory. Our goals are NOT to go